In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available onlyin cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areasfor a few years. But some others think everyone should be free to choose wherethey work .Discuss and give your own opinion.
In this day and age, it can be generally observed that the disparitybetween cities and the country has been aggravated by relentless urbanization.With respect to educational and medical facilities, a yawning gap has emergedbetween those in cities and the rural ones. This manifest chasm has promptedsome to suggest that teachers and doctors fresh out of university work in thecountry for a few years.Yet many are opposed to this view on the grounds that itinfringes upon individual freedom to choose where they work.Personally, I thinkboth these two views have merit and demerit.
Granted,assigning new teachers and doctors to the countryside may createcertain benefits.To begin with,this practice can help foster a strong sense ofobligation in many teachers and doctors.They can experience first-hand how therural residents are held back by the out-moded teaching and medical facilitiesand this, in turn, can inspire a host of professionals to commit themselves tothe alleviation of this disturbing situation. Moreover,the inferior living andworking conditions in the country can temper many of these young professionals’soul.They are very likely to be more tenacious and determined and hence moresuccessful than their urban counterparts in later careers.
文章来源于网络,如有侵权请联系我们,将会在第一时间处理
更多资讯可以关注微信公众号:IELTSIM。
[AD] 点击此处了解【雅思合集】【学习计划定制】【终生VIP服务】