针对近期的一个热点写作题目，笔者亲自创作习作一篇。前任考官Chris的评价是：“It's an excellent piece of writing. You have addressed the task very well and made good clear arguments. The writing and vocabulary is brilliant.
通篇文章印证了“四段式文章布局”的合理性以及模板句型的实用性、可行性。
以下是范文全貌和分段落简评。
You should spend 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are only available in cities but not in rural areas. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years while others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Answer:
It is a commonly accepted fact that in a number of countries quality educational institutes and hospitals are only accessible to city dwellers but not to rural people. To alleviate this problem, some people claim that junior teachers and doctors should first work in rural areas for some years whereas other people hold the view that people are entitled to opt for their working locations. Before presenting my own point of view I will first take a closer examination of each aforementioned perspective.
（引入话题，介绍两方的观点。套路虽然有些八股，但中规中矩；请高度注意笔者对于考题的改写。）
Evidently, sending teachers and doctors to rural areas would be beneficial to ameliorate resource allocation and has become a practice in some countries. Take Australia for example. As a large proportion of its territory belongs to sparsely populated areas which lack medical facilities, its government years ago enacted apolicy that by agreeing to work in designated areas for certain years, doctors from other countries could immigrate to Australia within a short time frame. And this policy has helped ease the professional shortage in remote areas. Another benefit of novice professionals working in rural areas, is the opportunity of gaining hands-on career exposure. As experience is often a prerequisite for securing a decent position in cities, working in small clinics or schools outside cities is usually regarded as a viable strategy for accumulating experience. In this case, it is also good foranindividual’s career advancement.
（论证支持方观点的两点理由，并分别辅之以解释、支持的句子；其中第一点理由的阐述中笔者举了一个具体的例子---澳大利亚移民政策中对于申请移民的外国医生的工作地点的规定。）
Nevertheless, from a human rights perspective, it is understandable that some people hold that everyone should have the freedom to work anywhere provided that it is legally allowed. Furthermore, the standard of living in rural areas is generally not as high as that in cities. Committed to working in such areas young people would have to endure various inconveniences and emotional discomfort, such asloneliness and distress. All of these represent a sacrifice that a young adult should not be obliged to make.
（分别从人权和艰苦的生活条件两个方面解释反对方的观点根据。）
After carefully balancing the arguments of each point of view, I tend to think thatit is advantageous, both socially and individually, for young professionals to work in rural areas. Although they have to endure hardships, these tough experiences can strengthen their character, improve them as doctors because working in less developed environments with minimal equipment could enhance their skills. In addition, if some rewards and privileges could be offered to rural professionals by governments, people would be more willing to accept such arrangements.
（笔者表明自己倾向于支持方，同时针对反对方的两点理由做出了非常有力的回应：1. 艰难困苦磨练人的性格，提高专业技能水平；2. 建议政府为在乡村工作的专业人士提供相关回报。）
文章来源于网络，如有侵权请联系我们，将会在第一时间处理
更多资讯可以关注微信公众号：IELTSIM。
[AD] 点击此处了解【雅思合集】【学习计划定制】【终生VIP服务】
